MakturaAcademy
Course 15A · Lesson 6 of 12

Behavioural science and persuasion

Sales team3 min read
Work Grade Verdict What we take
Influence (Cialdini, 2021) Mixed Caveat Peer proof from the buyer's own sector; small first commitments; only true scarcity
Pre-Suasion (Cialdini, 2016) Weak to mixed Caveat Unity: the founding cohort as "the firms building this with us"
Yes! (Goldstein, Martin, Cialdini, 2008) Mixed Caveat Specific, true descriptions of what peers do
Thinking, Fast and Slow (Kahneman, 2011) Mixed (12% to 46% replicability) Caveat; do not teach priming or ego-depletion Anchoring, framing, premortem, outside view
Nudge (Thaler, Sunstein) Mixed Caveat Protective defaults; a regular audit for friction
Misbehaving (Thaler, 2015) Mixed Caveat Fairness in price rises; mental accounting
Save More Tomorrow (Thaler, Benartzi, 2004) Strong in its domain Caveat Pre-committed future autonomy upgrades for Holly (an idea to confirm with Dom, not a feature)
Alchemy (Sutherland, 2019) Weak Caveat (as hypotheses) Costly signals of restraint; showing Holly's reasoning (a hypothesis, D10)
Contagious (Berger, 2013) Mixed Caveat The STEPPS checklist; practical, positive content
The Catalyst (Berger, 2020) Weak to mixed Caveat Lower barriers: small reversible steps, cost of doing nothing, clustered peer proof
Hooked (Eyal, 2014) Weak Caveat; do not teach variable reward as a profile-growth tactic A fixed weekly trigger; investment through the voice
Habit formation study (Lally and others, 2010) Mixed (small sample) Caveat Onboarding over 60 to 90 days; no streak shaming
Give and Take (Grant, 2013) Mixed Caveat Scoped giving, always paired with an ask
Predictably Irrational (Ariely, 2008) Debunked Do not teach Nothing; cite independent replications instead
Influence Is Your Superpower (Chance, 2022) Mixed Caveat "What would it take?"; the "gator 95%" claim is often unsupported
Learned Optimism (Seligman, 1990) Weak Do not teach the MetLife figures Hire on behaviours, not optimism scores
Prospect theory (Kahneman, Tversky, 1974 to 1981) Strong Safe A real anchor; loss framing around the buyer's specific risk
Defaults meta-analyses (Jachimowicz and others, 2019) Strong Safe Governance on by default; never pre-tick anything paid
Narrative transportation meta-analysis (van Laer, 2014) Strong Safe Peer stories with one number and one avoided risk
It doesn't hurt to ask (Huang and others, 2017) Mixed to strong Safe Discovery built on follow-up questions
Chameleons bake bigger pies (Maddux and others, 2008) Mixed Caveat Mirroring: limit it to pace and vocabulary
The Limits of Attraction (Frederick and others, 2014) Strong Safe (as a warning) Do not build pricing on decoys
Choice overload meta-analysis (Scheibehenne, 2010) Strong Safe (as a warning) Recommend one plan for indecision reasons, not because of the jam study
From Promotion to Emotion (CEB, Google, 2013) Mixed Caveat Sell personal value and personal safety
RCTs to Scale (DellaVigna, Linos, 2022) Strong Safe Expect small behaviour-change effects at scale
Tax compliance norms trial (Hallsworth and others, 2017) Strong Safe Show team norms only when they are favourable
The 5 Principles of Growth in B2B Marketing (Binet, Field, 2019) Mixed Caveat Emotional, broad-reach creative; brand and activation balance as a guide
The 95:5 rule (Weinberg, Lombardo, Dawes, 2021) Weak (illustrative) Caveat; never as a budget split Quote only as "roughly 5% of buyers are in market at any one time, on the LinkedIn B2B Institute's estimate" (illustrative, never measured)
How Brands Grow (Sharp, 2010) Mixed Caveat Mental availability; consistent distinctive assets
Category Entry Points in a B2B World (Romaniuk, 2022) Mixed to strong Caveat Five to eight buying situations, one per post
Popular claims to ban Debunked Do not teach 7-38-55, power posing, ego depletion, the Yale goals study, "buyers decide in seconds"
Progress is saved in this browser only.